Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;19:476. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5714-1

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting overall survival and penis cancer-specific survival

Variables Overall survival Penile carcinoma-specific survival
Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Hazard Ratio 95% CI P
T stage 0.066 0.420
Tx + Ta + T1 1.000 Referent 1.000 Referent
T2 1.405 1.016–1.945 0.040 1.219 0.701–2.118 0.483
T3 1.528 1.046–2.230 0.028 1.302 0.709–2.391 0.395
T4 2.134 0.839–5.428 0.112 2.786 0.797–9.740 0.109
Lymph nodes status < 0.001 < 0.001
Nx 1.000 Referent 1.000 Referent
N0 0.522 0.253–1.079 0.079 0.361 0.104–1.247 0.107
N1-N3 1.290 0.596–2.791 0.518 1.645 0.465–5.820 0.440
Grade 0.068 0.171
G1 1.000 Referent 1.000 Referent
G2 1.057 0.750–1.488 0.752 1.342 0.691–2.607 0.386
G3 + G4 1.484 1.002–2.197 0.049 1.913 0.924–3.959 0.080
Distant metastasis 1.796 1.042–3.095 0.035 2.938 1.484–5.815 0.002
regional lymph nodes removed 0.457 0.314–0.666 < 0.001 0.734 0.424–1.270 0.269
Surgery 1.768 1.063–2.940 0.028 1.992 0.947–4.192 0.069
LVI 1.403 1.017–1.936 0.039 1.324 0.798–2.198 0.277

SCCP squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; LVI lymphovascular invasion; CI confidence intervals

Significant values in bold