Table 6.
Effects of different parameter sharing strategies on performance on the CDR dataset
| Method | Intra-sentence level | Inter-sentence level | Document level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P (%) | R (%) | F (%) | P (%) | R (%) | F (%) | P (%) | R (%) | F (%) | |
| KCN | 70.61 | 60.41 | 65.12 | 65.37 | 12.57 | 21.09 | 69.65 | 72.98 | 71.28 |
| SGate-SAtt | 70.09 | 60.23 | 64.78 | 62.96 | 9.57 | 16.61†† | 69.02 | 69.79 | 69.40† |
| DGate-DAtt | 70.39 | 60.23 | 64.91† | 68.13 | 10.23 | 17.78†† | 70.06 | 70.45 | 70.25†† |
| SGate-DAtt | 69.15 | 60.98 | 64.81† | 63.19 | 10.79 | 18.43†† | 68.18 | 71.76 | 69.93†† |
The descriptions and analysis for Table 6 could be found in subsection “Effects of sharing parameters”. The marker † and †† represent P-value < 0.05 and P-value < 0.01, respectively, using pairwise t-test against KCN. The highest scores are highlighted in bold