Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 1;31(5):393–401. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy194

Table 5.

Results from the user evaluation statements (RAF = risk assessment framework)

Statements Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Average
Usefulness
 I would be likely to identify more risks by using the RAF 2 3 4 1 3.6
 I would be likely to analyse risks more effectively by using the RAF 9 1 3.9
 I would be likely to better evaluate risks by using the RAF 1 8 1 4
 I would be likely to assess risks more systematically by using the RAF 4 3 3 4.1
 I found the RAF useful to guide me on risk assessment 3 6 1 4.2
 Using the RAF could make me more confident about risk assessment 2 4 4 3.8
 Using the RAF could improve current risk assessment practice 5 4 1 4.4
 Using the RAF could make patients safer 3 2 4 1 3.7
Perceived usability
 I found the RAF clear and understandable 3 6 1 4.2
 I found the RAF easy to use 2 7 1 4.1
 I found the RAF easily compatible to our existing approach 2 7 1 4.1
Expected value
 The RAF improved my current knowledge on risk assessment 1 3 4 2 3.3
 The RAF increased my awareness on risk assessment 1 1 6 2 3.1
 The RAF could be beneficial to guide me on risk assessment 4 3 2 1 4
 I can see the value in having the RAF 6 2 2 4.4
 It is worth spending more time on risk assessment to use the RAF 3 4 3 4
 Switching from the old approach to the RAF is essential 3 3 3 1 3.7
What is familiar and what is new about the RAF?
What changes would you recommend to improve the RAF?

RAF, risk assessment framework.