Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;4(1):e000226. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000226

Table 2.

Change in BCVA study eye (SE) entire cohort, and categorisation by whether SE is ‘better’ or ‘worse’ relative to fellow eye in terms of letters at baseline*

N included Mean 1 Mean 2 Mean difference 95% CI P value
All study eyes
Change baseline—M12 100 63.2 68.1 4.9 2.9 to 7.0 <0.001
Change baseline—M18 104 62.9 69.6 6.7 4.4 to 9.1 <0.001
Study eye is ‘better’ eye
Change baseline—M12 30 64.8 68.5 3.7 1.4 to 6.0 0.002
Change baseline—M18 32 65.1 68.2 3.1 −0.8 to 7.1 0.118
Study eye is ‘worse’ eye
Change baseline—M12 70 62.5 68.0 5.4 2.6 to 8.2 <0.001
Change baseline—M18 72 62.0 70.1 8.3 5.5 to 11.2 <0.001

*RELIGHT protocol stated that if both eyes are eligible, the one with the worse visual acuity, as assessed at visit 1, will be selected for study treatment unless, based on medical reasons, the investigator deems the other eye the more appropriate candidate for study treatment.

BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity.