Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jan 8;24(5):1079–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.001

Table 4:

Factors Relating to RFS and CRFS in the ‘high risk’ subgroup

univariate multivariate
RFS

HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
cytogenetic risk at diagnosis 0.009 0.030
Poor reference reference
very poor 2.18 (1.21, 3.92) 1.95 (1.07, 3.58)

blasts at transplant 0.877
< 5 % reference
5–9 % 1.05 (0.59,1.85)

donor type 0.250
Match reference
Mismatch 0.50 (0.16,1.62)

conditioning intensity 0.102
Myeloablative reference
RIC 1.72 (0.90, 3.30)

transplant type 0.049 0.176
CD34 SELECTED reference reference
Unmodified 1.84 (1.00, 3.37) 1.54 (0.82, 2.88)

CRFS

HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
cytogenetic risk at diagnosis 0.007 0.048
Poor reference reference
very poor 2.21 (1.24, 3.93) 1.82 (1.01, 3.29)

blasts at transplant 0.455
< 5 % reference
5–9 % 1.24 (0.71, 2.15)

donor type 0.138
Match reference
Mismatch 0.41 (0.13, 1.33)

conditioning intensity 0.147
Myeloablative reference
RIC 1.61 (0.85, 3.08)

transplant type 0.002 0.010
CD34 SELECTED reference reference
Unmodified 2.68 (1.43, 5.01) 2.31 (1.22, 4.40)

Graft source 0.363
BM reference
PBSC 0.76 (0.42, 1.38)