Table 2:
Statistics
| Test identifier | Type of test | Sample size | Confidence intervals |
|---|---|---|---|
| a0 | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Three animals per treatment; six technical replicates per animal | −11.1 to 37.1 |
| a | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | 14.81–55.60 |
| b | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −20.02 to −2.95 |
| b1 | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four vehicle- and five LDN-treated animals; six technical replicates per animal, approximately 100 axons counted per animal | −45.96 to 11.67 |
| b2 | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Three vehicle- and three LDN-treated animals; six technical replicates per animal, approximately 100 axons counted per animal | 0.017–0.091 |
| b3 | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three vehicle- and three LDN-treated animals; six technical replicates per animal, approximately 100 axons counted per animal | −23.39 to −0.6092 |
| b4 | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | 0.76–123.91 |
| b5 | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −81.21 to 26.21 |
| c | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −94.40 to −60.46 |
| d | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | 38.05–91.35 |
| e | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | 4.59–17.66 |
| f | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −9.19 to −1.36 |
| g | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −4980.00 to 2499.00 |
| h | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −33,305.00 to −21,828.00 |
| I | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Four control and cuprizone-fed animals, six for vehicle- and LDN-treated animals; three technical replicates per animal | −7695.00 to 2665.00 |
| j | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −81.20 to −66.60 |
| k | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −68.00 to −53.30 |
| l | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −23.10 to −8.46 |
| m | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; eight 10× image fields counted per treatment group | 19.43–51.24 |
| n | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; eight 10× image fields counted per treatment group | −51.15 to −19.35 |
| o | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; eight 10× image fields counted per treatment group. | −33.99 to −2.18 |
| p | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | −5.49 to −2.99 |
| q | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | −7.02 to −3.91 |
| r | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | 1.11–3.61 |
| s | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | 2.84–5.95 |
| t | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | −2.77 to −0.35 |
| u | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment. | −0.17 to 2.25 |
| v | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | −1.36 to −0.16 |
| w | One-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | −2.47 to −0.51 |
| x | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment | Not available |
| y | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −89.42 to −43.00 |
| z | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Three independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −32.21 to 14.20 |
| aa | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −23.20 to 23.30 |
| ab | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | −19.65 to −2.29 |
| ac | Two-way ordinary ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple corrections test | Four independent cultures; three technical replicates per treatment; approximately 500–600 cells counted per treatment | 13.07–30.42 |
| ad | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Three independent cultures for both Pdgfra-CreERT2::Bmpr1afl/fl and Bmpr1afl/fl cocultures; eight 10× image fields counted per treatment group | 14.65–70.88 |
| ae | Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test | Three independent cultures for both PdgfraCreERT2::Bmpr1afl/fl and Bmpr1afl/fl cocultures; eight 10x image fields counted per treatment group | −39.73 to 36.81 |