Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;5(5):e01736. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01736

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of ratings of faces from the FACS database. Rows in bold indicate the expressions which were used in the experimental part of the study.

FACS database file names FACS action unit codes Mean score of trustworthiness SD
Trustworthy faces s6_12z26 6D+7C+12E+25D+26C 6.303 2.039
s6121517 6E+7D+12+15B+17D 5.546 1.769
s13a 13B 5.485 1.788
s12x_23 12B+23D+38A 5.576 1.751
sL14 L14C 5.788 1.833
Untrustworthy faces s10y_17 10E+17D 2.212 1.431
sL10x_25 L10B+25B 2.606 1.580
s10y1625 10C+16E+25E 2.394 1.273
s9_25 7C+9E+25C 2.061 1.144
s10y2325 10C+16A+23E+25E 2.121 .992
Ambiguous faces s20z G20E+21B 4.091 1.684
s6_15z17 6D+G7D+15E+17E+38B 4.212 1.933
s17_24 17D+24D 3.758 1.542
s4b 4D 4.212 2.043
s2 V2C+38A 4.182 1.310
s25 25B 3.546 1.787