Table 3.
Study author | BP type | Mean difference in BP (mm Hg) | 95% CIs | P value |
Randomised | ||||
Alexander et al (Nigeria)13 | SBP DBP |
−1.3 −2.8 |
−4.4 to 1.8 −5.0 to 0.6 |
0.40 0.01 |
McCracken et al (Guatemala)15 | SBP DBP |
−3.7 −3.0 |
−8.1 to 0.6 −5.7 to 0.4 |
0.10 0.02 |
Quinn et al (Ghana)16 | SBP DBP |
−2.1 −0.1 |
−6.6 to 2.4 −3.2 to 3.0 |
0.35 0.95 |
Non-randomised | ||||
Alexander et al (Bolivia)12 | SBP DBP |
−5.5 −1.1 |
*
* |
0.01 0.50 |
Clark et al (Nicaragua)14 | SBP DBP |
−5.9† −1.8† |
−11.3 to 0.4 −5.4 to 1.7 |
0.05 0.09 |
Level of significance: p<0.05.
*CIs not reported because Mann-Whitney test was used.
†Women aged ≥40 years mm Hg.
DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.