Skip to main content
. 2019 May 14;9(5):e027516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516

Table 3.

Trial registration data

Data category Information
Primary registry and trial identifying number Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617001292369
Date of registration in primary registry 07/09/2017
Secondary identifying numbers Universal Trial Number U1111-1196-6323
Sources of monetary or material support Sponsors (below)
Primary sponsor National Health and Medical Research Council - Research Committee Secretariat NHMRC GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601
Secondary sponsor Medibank Health Research Fund - 720 Bourke Street, Docklands, VIC 3008
Contact for public queries PH (p.hodges@uq.edu.au)
Contact for scientific queries PH (p.hodges@uq.edu.au)
Public title Efficacy of a multi-faceted web-based resource on spinal health literacy in patients with low back pain - a randomised controlled trial
Scientific title Efficacy of a multi-faceted web-based resource on spinal health literacy in patients with low back pain - a randomised controlled trial
Countries of recruitment Australia
Health condition or problem studied Low back pain
Intervention Multi-faceted web-based resource ‘MyBackPain’
Key inclusion and exclusion criteria Inclusion criteria: >18 years of age, current low back pain, reside in Australia, adequate English to complete surveys, internet access for the duration of the trial
Exclusion criteria: previous or existing spinal pathology (eg, fracture, cancer, infection, nerve root compromise)
Study type Randomised controlled trial, participant and assessor blinding, central computerised randomisation
Date of first enrolment 06/12/2017
Target sample size 440 (at least 25% acute participants that is, pain <6 weeks with a minimum of 1 month without symptoms)
Recruitment status Recruiting
Primary outcome(s) Health Literacy Questionnaire
Key secondary outcomes Quality of treatment preference (observed)
Patient decision-making—measured by evaluation of observed treatment choices. Treatments used by the participant during the follow-up period will be scored against the recommendations provided in the MyBackPain website, and based on a 5-point rating: ‘strong evidence’, ‘some evidence’, ‘unclear evidence/untested’, ‘evidence of no effect’ and ‘harmful’. The average score will be used.