Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;10:298. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00298
Reference PCOS diagnosis criteria Age(PCOS vs. control) (y) BMI(PCOS vs. control) (kg/m2)
Emekci Ozay, et al. (26) Rotterdam 23.99 ± 4.63 vs. 24.43 ± 4.39 24.32 ± 3.40 vs. 23.44 ± 4.08
Albalawi et al. (25) Oligomenorrhoea and abnormaL ovary 29.4 ± 3.93 vs. 26.7 ± 3.6* 46.04 ± 7.3 vs. 36.6 ± 8.17*
Chen et al. (22) Rotterdam 18.6 ± 0.68 vs. 17.89 ± 1.24 20.11 ± 2.31 vs. 21.46 ± 4.60
Daghestani (27) Rotterdam 24.05 ± 4.41 vs. 25.43 ± 4.80 22.84 ± 1.52 vs. 22.12 ± 1.48
Gorkem et al. (23) Rotterdam 27.76 ± 4.65 vs. 27.92 ± 4.67 26.34 ± 4.69 vs. 26.06 ± 5.39
Jeon et al. (28) Rotterdam 23.88 ± 4.86 vs. 24.92 ± 2.94 20.23 ± 2.19 vs. 19.77 ± 1.51*
Nyagolova et al. (29) Rotterdam 24.99 ± 0.49 vs. 26.65 ± 0.71 25.59 ± 0.65 vs. 24.88 ± 0.89
Panidis et al. (24) Chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenemia 24.30 ± 1.18 vs. 26.85 ± 1.06 33.02 ± 0.56 vs. 32.13 ± 1.85
Yilmaz et al. (30) Rotterdam 21 (17-25, 25-36) vs. 24.5 (17-25, 25-37)* 24.5 (18.1–34.8) vs. 23.1 (18–34.8)
Kaya et al. (31) Rotterdam 28.75 ± 3.49 vs. 30.25 ± 4.66 28.6 ± 5.08 vs. 26.4 ± 3.32
Lee et al. (32) Rotterdam \ \
Umayal et al. (33) \ \ \