Emekci Ozay, et al. (26) |
Rotterdam |
23.99 ± 4.63 vs. 24.43 ± 4.39 |
24.32 ± 3.40 vs. 23.44 ± 4.08 |
Albalawi et al. (25) |
Oligomenorrhoea and abnormaL ovary |
29.4 ± 3.93 vs. 26.7 ± 3.6*
|
46.04 ± 7.3 vs. 36.6 ± 8.17*
|
Chen et al. (22) |
Rotterdam |
18.6 ± 0.68 vs. 17.89 ± 1.24 |
20.11 ± 2.31 vs. 21.46 ± 4.60 |
Daghestani (27) |
Rotterdam |
24.05 ± 4.41 vs. 25.43 ± 4.80 |
22.84 ± 1.52 vs. 22.12 ± 1.48 |
Gorkem et al. (23) |
Rotterdam |
27.76 ± 4.65 vs. 27.92 ± 4.67 |
26.34 ± 4.69 vs. 26.06 ± 5.39 |
Jeon et al. (28) |
Rotterdam |
23.88 ± 4.86 vs. 24.92 ± 2.94 |
20.23 ± 2.19 vs. 19.77 ± 1.51*
|
Nyagolova et al. (29) |
Rotterdam |
24.99 ± 0.49 vs. 26.65 ± 0.71 |
25.59 ± 0.65 vs. 24.88 ± 0.89 |
Panidis et al. (24) |
Chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenemia |
24.30 ± 1.18 vs. 26.85 ± 1.06 |
33.02 ± 0.56 vs. 32.13 ± 1.85 |
Yilmaz et al. (30) |
Rotterdam |
21 (17-25, 25-36) vs. 24.5 (17-25, 25-37)*
|
24.5 (18.1–34.8) vs. 23.1 (18–34.8) |
Kaya et al. (31) |
Rotterdam |
28.75 ± 3.49 vs. 30.25 ± 4.66 |
28.6 ± 5.08 vs. 26.4 ± 3.32 |
Lee et al. (32) |
Rotterdam |
\ |
\ |
Umayal et al. (33) |
\ |
\ |
\ |