Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;8:e46174. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46174

Table 2. Effects of BLA inactivation on lever response latencies.

Table 2—source data 1. Hernandez et al.Table 2—source data 1.
elife-46174-table2-data1.xlsx (10.6KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.46174.014
Epoch Age Lever Laser condition Mean (sec) Std. error Statistical analysis
Deliberation Young Large Off (Baseline) 1.385 0.174 Laser condition:
Large: F(1, 13)=2.898, p=0.112
Small: F(1, 8)=2.050, p=0.190
Age:
Large:: F(1, 13)=1.988, p=0.182
Small: F(1, 8)=0.505, p=0.497
Laser condition × Age:
Large: F(1, 13)=0.588, p=0.457
Small: F(1, 8)=1.039, p=0.338
On (Inactivation) 1.442 0.204
Small Off (Baseline) 1.083 0.187
On (Inactivation) 1.543 0.326
Aged Large Off (Baseline) 0.956 0.186
On (Inactivation) 1.108 0.218
Small Off (Baseline) 1.043 0.187
On (Inactivation) 1.120 0.326
Outcome
(small reward)		 Young Large Off (Baseline) 1.322 0.136 Laser condition:
Large: F(1, 10)=1.429, p=0.260
Small: F(1, 10)=3.225, p=0.103
Age:
Large: F(1, 10)=4.149, p=0.069
Small: F(1, 10)=1.157, p=0.307
Laser condition × Age:
Large: F(1, 10)=0.257, p=0.623
Small: F(1, 10)=0.004, p=0.954
On (Inactivation) 1.217 0.141
Small Off (Baseline) 1.107 0.149
On (Inactivation) 0.938 0.054
Aged Large Off (Baseline) 0.912 0.136
On (Inactivation) 0.870 0.141
Small Off (Baseline) 0.962 0.149
On (Inactivation) 0.804 0.054

Raw data for this table are provided in Table 2—source data 1.