Table 2:
At least one antenatal care visit | Three or more antenatal care visits | Institutional deliveries | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | 95% CI | p value | β | 95% CI | p value | β | 95% CI | p value | |
Number of women using service at beginning of pre-Ebola Period (β0) | 9568 | 8941 to 10 195 | <0.0001 | 7555 | 7098 to 8012 | <0.0001 | 3602 | 3345 to 3859 | <0.0001 |
Average monthly change in number using service over pre-Ebola period (β1) | 109 | 54 to 164 | 0.0005 | 119 | 79 to 158 | <0.0001 | 61 | 38 to 84 | <0.0001 |
Average monthly change in number using service during Ebola virus disease outbreak (β2) | −923 | −1882 to 36 | 0.0585 | −624 | −1568 to 320 | 0^1834 | 72 | −333 to 476 | 0.7163 |
Difference between trend in service use during Ebola virus disease outbreak compared with pre-disease period (β3) | −418 | −535 to −300 | <0.0001 | −363 | −485 to −242 | <0.0001 | −240 | −293 to −187 | <0.0001 |
Average monthly change in number using service during post-Ebola period (β4) | 1712 | 357 to 3066 | 0.0157 | 103 | −1385 to 1590 | 0.8871 | 982 | 362 to 1602 | 0.0034 |
Difference between trend in service use during post-Ebola period compared with outbreak period (β5) | 173 | 51 to 294 | 0.0074 | 257 | 117 to 398 | 0.0010 | 149 | 91 to 206 | <0.0001 |
Overall trends | |||||||||
Linear trend during outbreak (β1 + β3) | −309 | −428 to −189 | <0.0001 | −244 | −369 to −119 | 0.0006 | −179 | −233 to −125 | <0.0001 |
Linear trend after outbreak (β1 + β3 plus β5) | −136 | −231 to −40 | 0.0075 | 13 | −109 to 134 | 0.8286 | −30 | −80 to 20 | 0.2294 |
Data are from the segmented ordinary least–square regression model adjusted for birth seasonality. p value tests the null hypothesis that each of the coefficients is equal to zero, following the model specification and description in the methods section.