Table 5.
Multiple logistic regression analysis of factors associated with breast cancer screening adoptiona, b, c
| Characteristics | Adoption (Stage 5/6/7) | vs. | Pre-Adoption (Stage 1/2/3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | P value | |
| BC Knowledged | 4.70 | (1.68 – 13.17) | 0.0033 |
| BC Self-Efficacyd | 1.12 | (0.66 – 1.90) | 0.6856 |
| BC Decisional Balanced | 1.96 | (1.18 – 3.24) | 0.0091 |
| Health Insurance (Ref: No health insurance) | 0.57 | (0.22 – 1.49) | 0.2522 |
| Doctor recommendation (Ref: No doctor recommendation) | 1.53 | (0.65 – 3.61) | 0.3347 |
| Annual Medical Check-up (Ref: No annual check-up) | 4.09 | (1.32 – 12.69) | 0.0147 |
| Family Cancer History (Ref: No family cancer history) | 1.02 | (0.43 – 2.42) | 0.9576 |
| Number of Observations | 187 | ||
| Wald χ2 | 52.57*** | ||
| Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 | 4.71 | ||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.3412 | ||
a
Age, marital status, self-reported health status, income level, education level, English level, and length in the US are included as control variables. The constant term is also included.
b
Heterogeneity robust standard errors are used.
c
The reference group in Model 1 is the Pre-Adoption Group.
d
1 SD change
*
p < 0.05
**
p < 0.01
***
p < 0.001