Table 4.
Author | Medication and study population | Adherence/persistence | Costs for adherent/persistent vs nonadherent/nonpersistent groups |
---|---|---|---|
Buysman [34] | GLP-1 RA, naïve, initiators on oral medications and/or insulin | Adherence and persistence: 1 year |
Diabetes-related, unadjusted (mean [SD]; median) Total: $9,081 ($8685); $6797 vs $7717 ($13,679); $4647, P = 0.028 Pharmacy total: $6338 ($2,639); $5606 vs $3568 ($2439); $3074, P < 0.001 Total medical: $2743 ($8,065); $683 vs $4149 ($13,383); $687, P = 0.018 |
Adherence: 1 year |
Diabetes-related, adjusted Total (95%CI): $9419 ($8574-10,308) vs $7667 ($6903-8573), P = 0.005 Pharmacy total (estimated from figure): $6000 vs $4000, P < 0.001 Total medical (estimated from figure): $3000 vs $4000, P = 0.080 |
||
Persistence: 1 year |
Diabetes-related, unadjusted (mean [SD]; median) Total: $8675 ($10,611); $6180 vs $7447 ($14,270); $3864, P = 0.092 Pharmacy total: $5571 ($2658); $5039 vs $2931 ($2298); $2341, P < 0.001 Total medical: $3103 ($10,124); $682 vs $4516 ($14,017); $699, P = 0.047 |
||
Persistence: 1 year |
Diabetes-related, adjusted (mean) Total (estimated from figure): $8700 vs $7500, P = 0.010 Pharmacy total (estimated from figure): $5000 vs $3500, P = 0.010 Total medical (stated in text): $3298 vs $4805, P = 0.017 |
||
Lin [31] | aInitiators of combination of GLP-1 RA and insulin | Persistence: 1 year |
All-cause, unadjusted Total: $43,096 vs $51,084, P = 0.028 Pharmacy total: $14,691 vs $10,791, P < 0.001 Total medical: $28,405 vs $40,292, P = 0.001 |
Persistence: 1 year |
Diabetes-related, unadjusted Total: $19,255 vs $20,327, P = 0.441 Pharmacy total: $8142 vs $5124, P < 0.001 Total medical: $11,114 vs $15,203, P = 0.003 |
||
Kalirai [30] | Insulin, naïve, initiators | Persistence: 1 and 2 years |
Year 1: Adjusted estimates from regression models All-cause total medical, inpatient and ED costs were significantly lower, but not outpatient costs Diabetes related total medical, inpatient and ED costs were significantly lower, but not outpatient costs Diabetes-related pharmacy basal and other insulins and total pharmacy costs were significantly higher, but this was not true for other injectables and oral antidiabetic medications All-cause healthcare (medical + pharmacy) costs were nonsignificantly lower for continuers Year 2: Results were similar with the exception that diabetes-related pharmacy costs for injectables were also significantly higher for continuers |
Ascher-Svanum [8] | Insulin, naïve, initiators | Early discontinuation (gap ≥ 30 days after first prescription): 1 year |
Adjusted estimates from regression models, all P values < 0.05 Acute care costs (inpatient + ED): 9.6% higher Outpatient costs: 6.4% lower Diabetes-related pharmacy costs: 42.9% lower All-cause pharmacy costs: 34.0% lower Total medical costs: 10.9% lower |
Wu [17] | Insulin, non-naïve, upon discharge from hospital | Persistence: 6 months |
Regression models with adjustment for pre-discharge costs and other baseline covariates Lower total medical service costs (difference of $2569, P = 0.007) Results driven by lower facility and other services costs (difference of $2265; P = 0.010), and physician service costs (difference of $524; P = 0.001) (pharmacy costs not reported) |
Perez-Nieves [29] | Insulin, naive, initiators of non-mixed basal insulin during study period | Continuers vs interrupters vs discontinuers |
Year 1 Continuers had lower medical costs (continuers: $10,890, interrupters: $13,674, discontinuers $13,021 Continuers had higher pharmacy costs (continuers: $7449, interrupters: $5239, discontinuers $4857 P < 0.05 for all comparisons of continuers vs interrupters and continuers vs discontinuers Total healthcare costs similar across the 3 cohorts Year 2: findings were similar |
Anderten [14] | Insulin, naive, initiators of basal insulin | Persistence: 1 year | No differences in treatment or prescription costs or medical services by persistence to insulin glargine vs NPH |
Kleinman [27] | Insulin, naive, initiators | Adherence (MPR): 1 year |
Regression models stratified by high vs low prior costs Higher MPR was associated with significantly lower total healthcare costs for patients with high (upper quartile) prior costs: $450 in savings per 10% increase in MPR Higher MPR was associated with significantly higher total healthcare costs for patients with low (lower quartile) prior costs (amount not stated) Both groups of patients experienced significantly lower medical costs (removing prescription costs) when MPR was high Higher prior cost group: 100% MPR group had $6,653 in medical costs vs 10% MPR group had $11,763 in medical costs Lower prior cost group: 100% MPR group had $3329 in medical costs vs 10% MPR group had $4,590 in medical costs |
Ayyagari [15] | Insulin, naïve, previously on oral medication or GLP-1 RA | Adherence: 1 year |
Adjusted costs using marginal structural models Pharmacy costs higher for adherent insulin users, averaging an additional $2,074 more annually for pen users and $2923 more for vial users (P < 0.001 for both patterns) Annual health care costs for both pen and vial users demonstrated lower costs for nonadherent patients, but these differences were not statistically significant |
Cobden [26] | Insulin, continuing, who converted from an insulin analog or human insulin administered using a vial/syringe to a biphasic insulin analog administered with a pen device | Adherence (MPR ≥ 80%): 2 years |
Adjusted costs Adherence was associated with significant reductions in all-cause healthcare costs (exponentiated coefficient estimate 0.55, 95% CI 0.31–0.80, P < 0.05). This implies an average 45% decrease in all-cause total healthcare costs for adherent compared to nonadherent patients |
Wei [5] | Insulin, naïve, receiving > 1 oral medication or GLP-1 RA | Persistence: 1 year |
Unadjusted costs Pharmacy costs: $5761 vs $4319, P < 0.0001 Total medical costs: $17,007 vs $18,367, P = 0.1419 |
Hadjiyianni [25] | Insulin, naive, initiators of basal insulin | Continuers vs interrupters vs discontinuers:1 year |
Adjusted costs (in yen) Those who interrupted or discontinued had higher costs of hospitalization than continuers Total costs did not differ among the 3 groups Total medical costs did not differ among the 3 groups Total pharmacy costs were higher for the continuers |
Chandran [28] | Insulin, naive, pen prescription within study period | Adherence (MPR): 1 year |
Unadjusted costs Average annual per-patient healthcare expenditures (P = 0.007) Least adherent group (MPR < 0.20, 11.0% of patients): $26,310 Most adherent group (MPR > 0.80; 34.6% of patients): $23,839 Average annual per-patient pharmacy expenditures (P < 0.001) Least adherent group: $5395 Most adherent group: $10,174 |
Perez-Nieves [9] | Insulin, naïve, initiating basal insulin | Continuers vs interrupters vs discontinuers (identified retrospectively) |
Cross-sectional survey The three groups did not differ in reporting the impact of insulin use on budget management |
aText of article is unclear regarding whether the numbers reported are charges or costs of care
GLP-1 RA glucose-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, SD standard deviation, ED emergency department, MPR medication possession ratio, CI confidence interval