Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;10:596. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00596

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients for IT and DS response to APR of 152 Chinese Yellow and Huai River Valleys Wheat Zone landraces in five environments.

IT vs. ITa 15MY 15CZ 16MY 16CZ 17CZ
15MY 1 0.591∗∗ 0.632∗∗ 0.634∗∗ 0.585∗∗
15CZ 1 0.416∗∗ 0.687∗∗ 0.505∗∗
16MY 1 0.518∗∗ 0.648∗∗
16CZ 1 0.520∗∗
17CZ 1
DS vs. DSb 15MY 15CZ 16MY 16CZ 17CZ
15MY 1 0.611∗∗ 0.611∗∗ 0.484∗∗ 0.549∗∗
15CZ 1 0.608∗∗ 0.681∗∗ 0.411∗∗
16MY 1 0.569∗∗ 0.493∗∗
16CZ 1 0.388∗∗
17CZ 1
IT vs. DSc 15MY 15CZ 16MY 16CZ 17CZ
15MY 0.893∗d 0.574∗∗ 0.669∗∗ 0.620∗∗ 0.553∗∗
15CZ 0.588∗∗ 0.781∗∗ 0.471∗∗ 0.718∗∗ 0.456∗∗
16MY 0.564∗∗ 0.531∗∗ 0.808 0.621∗∗ 0.530∗∗
16CZ 0.441∗∗ 0.491∗∗ 0.412∗∗ 0.693∗∗ 0.393∗∗
17CZ 0.492∗∗ 0.404∗∗ 0.607∗∗ 0.488∗∗ 0.826

aComparisons between the infection type of different environments. 15MY = 2015 Manyang; 15CZ = 2015 Chongzhou; 16MY = 2016 Manyang; 16CZ = 2016 Chongzhou; 17CZ = 2017 Chongzhou; bComparisons between the disease severity of different environments; cComparison between the IT and DS of different environments; dCorrelation coefficients between IT and DS of the same environment were labeled in bold; The P-values of all the correlation coefficients in the table use QTL IciMapping (P < 0.01).