Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;10:352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00352

Table 4.

Results of univariate analyses of utility scores.

Variables EQ-5D utility EQ VAS
Mean SD F/t p-value Mean SD F/t p-value
All patients (n = 125) 0.53 0.26 48.5 20.98
Sociodemography
Capacity to pay
 Not affordable 0.46 0.24 42.89 18.29
 Affordable 0.65 0.25 −4.26 <0.0001** 57.18 22.09 −3.93 0.0001**
Life threatening
 No 0.79 0.14 3.02 65.88 19.65
 Yes 0.51 0.26 0.0031** 47.31 20.62 2.47 0.0148**
Response to treatment
 No change/deterioration 0.42 0.28 39.45 18.64
 Improvement 0.63 0.20 −4.72 <0.0001** 56.85 19.63 −5.07 <0.0001**
Side effects
 Unbearable 0.27 0.3 34.17 19.50
 Bearable 0.57 0.23 −4.97 <0.0001** 50.91 20.33 −3.25 0.0015**
Social support
 Low support 0.45 0.15 48.75 13.15
 Moderate support 0.40 0.32 35.23 17.18
 High support 0.60 0.19 10.67 0.0001* 55.79 19.72 16.68 <0.0001*
Psychology factors
Depression
  Likely noncase 0.70 0.15 65.74 14.76
  Doubtful case 0.52 0.24 45.22 16.41
  Likely case 0.31 0.24 31.16 <0.0001* 28.39 12.39 63.30 <0.0001*
Anxiety
  Likely noncase 0.72 0.15 67.09 15.77
  Doubtful case 0.52 0.20 43.84 15.92
  Likely case 0.33 0.27 31.4 <0.0001* 33.13 14.94 51.60 <0.0001*

EQ VAS, EQ-visual analog scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 Dimensions.

*ANOVA test; **t-test.