Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;10:1127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01127

Table 2.

Study protocols for muscular strength exercises.

References Intervention protocol (a-tDCS) Control Strength exercise characteristic Main outcomes
Montage of electrodes Electrode size (cm2) Current intensity (mA) Duration (min) Muscle investigated Type of contraction Muscle strength test
Lattari et al., 2016 Left DLPFC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Elbow flexors Dynamic Volume-load (kg) a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05)
Lattari et al., 2017 Central MC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Ankle, hip, and knee extensors Dynamic Muscle power (W) ≠ between the conditions
Lattari et al., 2018b Left DLPFC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Ankle, hip, and knee extensors Dynamic Volume-load (kg) a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05)
Hazime et al., 2017 MC dominant limb (stimulus) and ipsilateral OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Internal and external rotator Isometric MIVC (N/kg) MIVC (internal and external rotator):
a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05)
Vargas et al., 2018 Left and right MC (stimulus) and ipsilateral OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Knee extensors Isometric MIVC (N/kg) in dominant and non-dominant limb Dominant a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05)
Non-dominant ≠ between the conditions
Sales et al., 2016 Left TC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Knee extensors Dynamic Isokinetic testing (angular velocity of 180°·s−1 and 60°·s−1):Total work (J) and peak torque (N.m) Total work: a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05) Peak torque: ≠ between the conditions
Cogiamanian et al., 2007 Right MC (stimulus) and right shoulder (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 1.5 10 No intervention Left elbow flexors Isometric MIVC (N) and TTE with 35% of the MIVC (s) MIVC: ≠ between the conditions
TTE: a-tDCS > control (p < 0.05)
Frazer et al., 2017 Left MC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 25 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Left biceps brachii Dynamic 1RM ↑ Strength of the untrained limb
Hendy and Kidgell, 2014 Left MC (stimulus) and Left OFC (reference) 25 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Wrist extensor muscles Dynamic 1RM ↑ Strength of untrained wrist extensor muscles
Williams et al., 2013 Right MC (stimulus) and left OFC 35 1.5 20 30 (s) (sham) Left elbow flexors Isometric MVC and TTF at 20% MVC TTE: ↑ Endurance time
Angius et al., 2016 Two montages of the electrodes: First: Left MC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference); Second: Left MC (stimulus) and left shoulder (reference) 12 (stimulus and reference) 2 10 30 (s) (sham) Right knee extensors Isometric MIVC (N.m) TTE with 20% of the MIVC (s) MIVC: NR
TTE: Second position-a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.05); First position ≠ between the conditions
Kan et al., 2013 Right MC (stimulus) and right shoulder (reference) 24 (stimulus and reference) 2 10 30 (s) (sham) Left elbow flexors Isometric MIVC (N.m) and TTE with 30% of the MIVC (s) MIVC: ≠ between the conditions
TTE: ≠ between the conditions
Abdelmoula et al., 2016 Left MC (stimulus) and right shoulder (reference) 35 1.5 10 90 (s) (sham) Left elbow flexors Isometric MIVC (N) and TTE at 35% MVC TTE:
↑ Endurance time
Tanaka et al., 2009 Right MC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 10 30 (s) (sham) Adduction between the left great toe and the digitus secundus (leg pinch force) adduction Between the Index finger and the Thumb pad of the Left hand (hand pinch force) Isometric PF (N) PF (Leg):
a-tDCS > sham (p < 0.01)
Montenegro et al., 2015 Left MC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference) 35 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Knee extensors and flexors Dynamic Isokinetic testing (angularvelocity of 60°·s−1:Total work (J) and peak torque (N.m) Total work: ≠ between the conditions Peak torque: ≠ between the conditions
Flood et al., 2017 Positioning of the electrodes (4 × 1) MC contralateral to the non-dominant side (stimulus, C3 or C4) and four cathodal electrodes placed at a distance of 5 cm around the anode (reference); radius ≈ 1.1 cm 2 20 At the start and at the end (2 mA in ramping) Elbow flexors Isometric MIVC (N.m) and TTE at 30% MVC No improvement
Ciccone et al., 2018 Two montages of electrodes: First- Left TC (stimulus) and right OFC (reference); Second- Right TC (stimulus) and left OFC (reference) 25 (stimulus and reference) 2 20 30 (s) (sham) Knee extensors Dynamic Isokinetic testing (angular velocity of 180°·s−1): Average work (Nm.s) ≠ between the conditions
Radel et al., 2017 Two montages of electrodes (4x1): First: Right MC (stimulus) and four cathodal electrodes placed at a distance of 4 cm around the anode (reference); Second: Right DLPFC (stimulus) and four cathodal electrodes placed at a distance of 4 cm around the anode (reference); radius ≈1.1 cm - 2 ≤ 20 30 (s) (sham) Elbow flexors Isometric TTE at 35% MVC No improvement

↑ (increased); maximal dynamic strength (1RM); maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); peak power output (PPO); a-tDCS- anodal transcranial direct current stimulation; CG, control group; cm2, square centimeter; mA, milliamps; min, minutes; s, seconds; MC, motor cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; OBF, orbitofrontal cortex; ≈, approximately; MIVC, Maximal Isometric Voluntary Contraction; PF, Pinch Force; N, Newtons; N.m, Newtons per meter; N/kg, Newtons per kilogram (normalized by the body mass of each participant); Kg, Kilogram; J, Joules; %, percentage; Nm.s, Newtons meter per second; TTF, Time to failure; TTE, time to exhaustion; NR, not reported.