Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD008122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008122.pub2
  Sensitivity Specificity
  TP/diseased P value change TN/not diseased P value change
                 
Type 2 vs Type 1 Type 2 Type 1     Type 2 Type 1    
Van den Broek 2006 144/152 137/152 P = 0.19 +4.6% (‐1.3% to +10.5%) 674/744 740/744 P < 0.001 ‐8.9% (‐11.0% to ‐6.7%)
                 
Type 2 vs Type 4 Type 2 Type 4     Type 2 Type 4    
Van den Broek 2006 144/152 127/152 P = 0.003 +11.1% (+4.3% to +18.1%) 674/744 731/744 P < 0.001 ‐7.7% (‐10.0% to ‐5.4%)
                 
Type 3 vs Type 1 Type 3 Type 1     Type 3 Type 1    
Mens 2007b 60/60 113/127 P = 0.006 +11.0% (+5.6% to +16.5%) 115/124 678/711 P = 0.26 ‐2.6%  (‐7.4% to +2.2%)
Dev 2004 17/17 21/21 P = 1.00 0% (not estimable) 13/13 9/9 P = 1.00 0% (not estimable)
                 
Type 3 vs Type 4 Type 3 Type 4     Type 3 Type 4    
Mens 2007b 60/60 58/60 P = 0.50 +3.3% (‐1.2% to +7.9%) 115/124 121/124 P = 0.14 ‐4.8% (‐10.1% to +0.5%)
Dev 2004 17/17 69/85 P = 0.07 +18.8% (+10.5% to +27.1%) 13/13 54/54 P = 1.00 0% (not estimable)
                 
Type 5 vs Type 1 Type 5 Type 1     Type 5 Type 1    
Sharew 2009 167/168 167/168 P = 1.00 0% (‐1.6% to 1.6%) 490/500 484/500 P = 0.32 +1.2% (‐0.8% to +3.2%)