Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD000215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000215.pub4

Singhi 2003.

Methods Randomized controlled trial
Duration: recruitment from June 1999 to June 2000. Participants were followed up for 12 months.
Participants Number: 147 randomized, 122 included in the analysis (68 male, 54 female)
Inclusion criteria: children with seizures for less than 3 months and up to 3 small enhancing lesions in parenchyma
Exclusion criteria: raised intracranial pressure, focal neurological deficit, neurodevelopmental delay, any chronic systemic disease, other lesions on imaging, evidence of tuberculosis
Type of lesion: non‐viable
Interventions Group 1. Oral prednisolone: 2 mg per kg once daily for 5 days plus 15 mg per kg per day albendazole for 4 weeks starting 2 days after prednisolone started
 Group 2. Oral prednisolone: 2 mg per kg once daily for 5 days plus 15 mg per kg per day albendazole for 1 week starting 2 days after prednisolone started
Outcomes Included in the review: persistence of lesions at 1 month; recurrence of seizures within 12 months; epigastric discomfort with treatment
Not included in the review: lesion size reduced at 6 months
Notes Location: India
Source of funding: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Quote: "...they were randomized according to random number tables..."
Decision: done
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not described
Decision: unclear
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "None of the persons involved in the study (i.e. patient, investigators and neuroradiologist) was aware of this random allocation. The code was opened only after completion of the study"
Decision: done
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk 147 randomized, 25 excluded due to poor compliance with treatment or inadequate follow up (83% included in the analysis). No discussion of the differences between participants included in the analysis and those excluded.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Free of other bias? Low risk No evidence of other bias