Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD004529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004529.pub2
Trial Intervention No. participants Median (h) Range (h) 95% CI P‐value
Llanos‐Cuentas 2001 Atovaquone‐proguanil 14 57 < 0.0001
Chloroquine 13 48
Borrmann 2003 Atovaquone‐proguanil 92 72 10 (IQR) 0.0002
Amodiaquine 78 70 24 (IQR)
Llanos‐Cuentas 2001 Atovaquone‐proguanil 5 42
Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine 7 42
Mulenga 1999 Atovaquone‐proguanil 81 72 12 to 102 12 to 24 < 0.05
Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine 81 48 6 to 114
Anabwani 1999 Atovaquone‐proguanil 81 64.5 15 to 103
Halofantrine 83 50.4 17 to 78 11.5 to 20.8 < 0.001
Looareesuwan 1999a Atovaquone‐proguanil 79 66.5 24 to 127 < 0.05
Mefloquine 79 65.0 24 to 167