Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD004529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004529.pub2
Trial Intervention No. participants Median (h) Range (h) 95% CI P‐value
Llanos‐Cuentas 2001 Atovaquone‐proguanil 14 46 8 to 92 — —
Chloroquine 13 48 20 to 72 — —
Borrmann 2003 Atovaquone‐proguanil 92 47 48 (IQR) — 0.85
Amodiaquine 78 46 43 (IQR) — —
Llanos‐Cuentas 2001 Atovaquone‐proguanil 5 40 20 to 26 — —
Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine 7 44 28 to 72 — —
Mulenga 1999 Atovaquone‐proguanil 67 23 1 to 160.5 — —
Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine 77 48 6 to 101 — —
Anabwani 1999 Atovaquone‐proguanil 81 29.8 0.5 to 99 ‐11 to 6.4 0.60
Halofantrine 83 35.3 0.5 to 123 — —
Looareesuwan 1999a Atovaquone‐proguanil 84 53.5 3 to 152 — —
Mefloquine 88 50.0 4 to 147 — —