Table 3.
b | SE | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Women: fixed effects | |||
Intercept | 4.29 | 0.51 | < 0.001 |
Hourly feelings of annoyance | −0.20 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
Dating aggression perpetration | −0.37 | 0.24 | 0.12 |
Hourly feelings of annoyance × dating aggression perpetration | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
Women: random effects | |||
Level 1 intercept | 19.24 | 4.06 | < 0.001 |
Level 2 intercept | 26.61 | 7.34 | < 0.001 |
Men: fixed effects | |||
Intercept | 6.64 | 0.60 | < 0.001 |
Hourly feelings of annoyance | −0.41 | 0.25 | 0.10 |
Dating aggression perpetration | −0.71 | 0.58 | 0.22 |
Hourly feelings of annoyance × dating aggression perpetration | −0.04 | 0.27 | 0.88 |
Men: random effects | |||
Level 1 intercept | 28.34 | 4.58 | < 0.001 |
Level 2 intercept | 34.40 | 7.73 | < 0.001 |
Note. PRV = percent reduction in variance explained by the moderation model; Women: PRV in level 1 electrodermal activity (EDA) = 12.27%, PRV in level 2 electrodermal activity (EDA) = 11.38%, ICC = 0.58; Men: PRV in level 1 electrodermal activity (EDA) = 6.62%, PRV in level 2 electrodermal activity (EDA) = 10.01%, ICC = 0.55. Bold signifies *p < .05.