Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;10:458. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00458

Table 2.

Estimated type I error rates at the significance level of 5% for GLMM-MiRKAT/aGLMM-MiRKAT based on the random slope model with Gaussian, Binomial or Poisson responses (Unit: %).

n = 20 n = 50
ρjj L M H L M H
Gaussian
KJ 5.10 4.96 5.12 4.87 4.98 5.04
KBC 5.11 4.89 4.97 5.10 4.88 5.03
KU 5.03 4.95 5.13 5.03 5.03 5.10
K0.5 5.07 4.91 4.90 4.89 4.91 5.09
KW 4.96 4.95 4.87 4.83 5.03 5.01
adaptive 4.97 4.94 5.01 4.94 4.86 5.04
Binomial
KJ 5.08 4.80 5.01 5.09 5.02 4.83
KBC 4.93 4.94 5.1 4.89 5.02 4.88
KU 5.04 4.99 5.04 5.07 5.40 4.83
K0.5 5.02 4.97 4.84 5.00 5.08 4.96
KW 4.89 5.07 5.02 4.96 5.08 4.85
adaptive 4.99 4.94 4.85 4.86 5.11 4.82
Poisson
KJ 5.01 4.98 4.76 4.93 5.10 4.90
KBC 5.16 4.76 5.02 5.03 5.03 5.02
KU 4.90 5.06 4.92 5.09 5.19 4.93
K0.5 5.14 4.87 5.10 4.85 4.88 5.10
KW 5.12 4.82 5.28 4.86 5.06 5.18
adaptive 5.05 4.70 4.88 5.00 4.94 4.78

KJ: Jaccard dissimilarity; KBC: Bray-Curtis dissimilarity; KU: Unweighted UniFrac distance; K0.5: Generalized UniFrac distance (θ = 0.5); KW: Weighted UniFrac distance; adaptive: adaptive GLMM-MiRKAT (aGLMM-MiRKAT). L: low within-cluster correlation (ρjj = (1+j2)(j2+3)); M: medium within-cluster correlation (ρjj = (1+j2)(j2+2)); H: high within-cluster correlation (ρjj = (1+j2)(j2+ 53)).