Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD005967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005967.pub4

Anh 1995.

Methods Study design: An open label randomized controlled trial
Study dates: Jul 1992 to May 1995
Participants Number: 190 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: adults 15 to 65 yr with cerebral malaria (asexual P. falciparum parasitaemia and clinical signs of cerebral malaria alone or associated with other visceral complications)
Exclusion criteria: associated P. vivax parasitaemia, pregnancy, and concomitant diseases such as diabetes mellitus, stroke, meningitis, head trauma, pulmonary tuberculosis, or AIDS
Interventions 1. Artesunate: 60 mg intravenous (IV) at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h
 2. Quinine: 10 mg/kg IV over 4 h at 0 h then 10 mg/kg IV every 8 h until able to swallow then quinine by mouth at similar doses every 8 h until day 7
Additional antimalarials: artesunate treatment arm given one dose of mefloquine by mouth 15 mg/kg at day 7; quinine none
Outcomes 1. Death within 24 h
 2. Death after 24 h
 3. Coma recovery time
 4. Fever clearance time
 5. Parasite clearance time of 50%
 6. Parasite clearance time of 95%
 7. Parasite clearance time of 100%
Not included in the review:
 8. Time to sit
 9. Time to take oral by self medication
Notes Location: Vietnamese clinical research centre
Transmission: not specified
Funding: World Health Organization
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Personal communication with author: Central randomization
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Personal communication with author: Central randomization
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes: Death Low risk Comment: An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes: Others High risk Comment: An open label trial. No attempt was made to blind participants, providers or outcome assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up are recorded
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified