Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD008603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008603.pub2

Gotuzzo 1993.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: A randomized controlled trial (individually randomized)
Duration: Vaccination from Sept to Dec 1991; follow‐up 28 days
Participants Sample size: 241 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 to 38 years
Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, antibiotics or diarrhoea within the previous 72 h, previous cholera vaccine.
Interventions Vaccine 1: CVD 103‐HgR live attenuated vaccine containing:
  • 5 x 109 lyophilized organisms of a genetically modified V. cholerae O1


Vaccine 2: CVD 103‐HgR live attenuated vaccine containing:
  • 5 x 108 lyophilized organisms of a genetically modified V. cholerae O1


Placebo: 5 x 108 cells of heat‐killed E. coli K‐12 strain
Outcomes Included in review:
  • Adverse events during the first 7 days


Not included in the review:
  • Immunological outcomes: Geometric mean rise in vibriocidal antibody titres, and proportion who develop ≥4 fold rises in serum titres from baseline after one or two doses

Notes Location: Peru
Setting: 2 groups: high socioeconomic group: medical students and physicians from the Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, and a low socioeconomic group: selected from Canto Grande, a periurban slum community with poor water and sanitation.
Source of funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: Described as 'randomized', no further details given.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: 'Eligible adults were administered coded preparations sequentially labelled A, B, or C, two of which contained the vaccine and the other a placebo'.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Efficacy outcomes Unclear risk Not applicable as efficacy not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Safety outcomes Low risk Quote: 'Double‐blind clinical follow‐up was maintained for 7 days following vaccination'.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Efficacy outcomes Unclear risk Not applicable as efficacy not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Safety outcomes Low risk Comment: No losses to follow up are reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias