Gotuzzo 1993.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: A randomized controlled trial (individually randomized) Duration: Vaccination from Sept to Dec 1991; follow‐up 28 days |
|
Participants | Sample size: 241 enrolled Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 to 38 years Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, antibiotics or diarrhoea within the previous 72 h, previous cholera vaccine. |
|
Interventions | Vaccine 1: CVD 103‐HgR live attenuated vaccine containing:
Vaccine 2: CVD 103‐HgR live attenuated vaccine containing:
Placebo: 5 x 108 cells of heat‐killed E. coli K‐12 strain |
|
Outcomes |
Included in review:
Not included in the review:
|
|
Notes | Location: Peru Setting: 2 groups: high socioeconomic group: medical students and physicians from the Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, and a low socioeconomic group: selected from Canto Grande, a periurban slum community with poor water and sanitation. Source of funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: Described as 'randomized', no further details given. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: 'Eligible adults were administered coded preparations sequentially labelled A, B, or C, two of which contained the vaccine and the other a placebo'. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Efficacy outcomes | Unclear risk | Not applicable as efficacy not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Safety outcomes | Low risk | Quote: 'Double‐blind clinical follow‐up was maintained for 7 days following vaccination'. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Efficacy outcomes | Unclear risk | Not applicable as efficacy not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Safety outcomes | Low risk | Comment: No losses to follow up are reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of selective reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other bias |