Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD000320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000320.pub2

Usha 2000.

Methods Design: randomized controlled trial
Generation of allocation sequence: computer‐generated random‐number table
Allocation concealment: investigators did not take part in allocation
Blinding: none
Inclusion of randomized participants in the analysis: 100%
Participants Number: 88 enrolled (aged over 5 years with a mean age of 21.3 years (ivermectin) and 22.4 years (permethrin); 59 males, 26 females)
Inclusion criteria: clinical diagnosis (3 out of burrow/lesions in classical sites/nocturnal itch/family history) or microscopic diagnosis
Exclusion criteria: pregnancy; breastfeeding; treatment for scabies within previous 1 month; serious central nervous system, hepatic, cardiac, or renal disease
Interventions 1. Oral ivermectin 200 µg/kg bodyweight single dose (43 participants) 
 2. 5% permethrin cream applied topically overnight (45 participants)
Not included in this review
 3. Second dose of oral ivermectin, 200 µg/kg for treatment failures in intervention group 1 (12 participants) 
 4. Second topical application 5% permethrin cream for treatment failures in intervention group 2 (1 participant)
Outcomes 1. Number of participants clinically cured at 2 weeks (defined as symptom improvement)
 2. Adverse events
Not included is this review:
 3. Number of participants clinically cured at 1, 4, and 8 weeks
Notes Location: India
Date: August 1996 to December 1997
Contacts treated with same drug as the index case, except contacts who were children under 5 or pregnant women; these were treated with 12.5% to 25% benzyl benzoate emulsion
Author confirmed randomization method and blinding
3 participants in ivermectin group withdrawn due to using additional treatment