Study	Reason for exclusion
Abedin 2007	Non‐randomized study
Alebiosu 2003	Allocation method inadequate; expressed preference of participants for different interventions taken into account
Amer 1981	Non‐randomized study
Bockarie 2000	Non‐controlled study
Burgess 1986	Non‐randomized study
Cannon 1948	Non‐controlled study
Chowdhury 1977	Non‐controlled study
Cubela 1978	Non‐randomized study
Curiati 1984	Non‐randomized study
Damodaran 1979	A trial of iron and folic acid supplementation
Daneshpajooh 2000	Unclear if randomized
Dika 2006	Non‐controlled study
Dourmishev 1998	Non‐controlled study
Dunne 1991	Study participants selected on basis of having onchocerciasis rather than scabies
Gallegos 1996	Thesis unavailable
Gordon 1944	Non‐randomized study
Grabner 1970	Non‐randomized study
Hamm 2006	Non‐controlled study
Hanna 1978	Non‐controlled study
Haustein 1989	Non‐randomized study
Henderson 1991	Non‐randomized study
Henderson 1992	Non‐randomized study
Kar 1994	Case study
Kaur 1980	Non‐randomized study
Kenawi 1993	Non‐randomized study
Khan 2007	Non‐randomized study
Konstantinov 1979	Non‐randomized study
Landegren 1979	Non‐randomized study
López 2003	Non‐randomized study
Macotela‐Ruiz 1996	Not truly randomized; unbalanced groups
Mapar 2008	Non‐randomized study
Meinking 1995b	Non‐controlled study
Mellanby 1945	Non‐randomized study
Mozgunov 1978	Non‐controlled study
Nag 1995	Non‐randomized study
Neto 1984	Non‐randomized study
Oberoi 2007	Non‐randomized study; cure not assessed
Oladimeji 2000	Participants randomized to 1 of 3 treatments (lippia oil, benzyl benzoate, or liquid paraffin) but no clear randomization within these groups to 36 separate treatment schedule subgroups
Oladimeji 2005	Trial design inadequate with control group consisting of participants excluded from intervention arms
Oyelami 2009	Non‐controlled study
Paasch 2000	Non‐randomized study
Paschoal 1985	Not a trial of scabies treatment effectiveness
Pierce 1951	Non‐randomized study
Regis 2003	Outcome is reinfestation not treatment failure
Reid 1990	Non‐controlled study
Sehgal 1972	No assessment of any outcomes were reported
Srinivas 1996	Randomization unclear; comparison of lindane applied by bath, paint brush, and spray
Srivastava 1980	Allocation made on a "random basis and on availability of drugs"
Sule 2007	Non‐randomized study
Suvanprakorn 1987	Non‐controlled study
Taplin 1983a	Non‐randomized study
Taplin 1983b	Non‐controlled study
Taplin 1991	Non‐controlled study
Tausch 1999	Comparison between 2 different brands of the same drug (10% crotamiton lotion)
Thianprasit 1984	Non‐controlled study
Woolridge 1948	Non‐controlled study
Yonkonsky 1990	Non‐controlled study