Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;2019(5):CD009613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009613.pub4

Comparison 5. Automated telemedicine monitoring versus conventional.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Caesarean section 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.62, 1.48]
2 Neonatal morbidity composite 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.53, 2.62]
3 Gestational age at birth 3 84 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.24 [‐0.39, 0.88]
4 Use of additional insulin therapy 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.89, 1.12]
5 Insulin requirement at end of study 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 18.4 [12.88, 23.92]
6 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal fasting blood glucose: before breakfast 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.0 [‐1.22, ‐0.78]
7 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal fasting blood glucose: before lunch 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.10 [‐1.32, ‐0.88]
8 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal HbA1c 3 82 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.17 [‐0.82, 0.48]
9 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal post‐prandial blood glucose 2 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.80 [‐1.67, 0.08]
10 Weight gain during pregnancy [kg] 1 32 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.70 [‐4.95, 3.55]
11 Macrosomia 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.31, 4.43]
12 Birthweight 1 32 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.16 [‐0.64, 0.32]