Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2018 Nov 23;23(12):1051–1063. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1548669

Table 2.

Scale information and psychometrics for primary sexual health, secondary sexual health, and secondary media-related outcome variables.

 Outcomes Scales # Items Sample Item α M SD
 Primary Intentions
 to have sexa* 3 How likely is it that you will have sexual intercourse in the next year? 0.90 1.65 .73
 to use contraception/protectionb 3 If you were to decide to have sex, how likely would you be to use a condom? 0.78 3.35 .66
 for sexual communication with partnerb 3 If you were to decide to have sex, how likely would you be to talk with a partner about pregnancy? 0.90 3.32 .67
 for sexual communication with parentb 1 If you were to decide to have sex, how likely would you be to talk with your parent(s) or another trusted adult? --
 for sexual communication with doctorb 1 If you were to decide to have sex, how likely would you be to talk with a doctor or another medical professional? --
 Secondary Attitudes
 about teen sexual activityc 4 I believe it is OK for teens to be sexually active. 0.59 1.91 .55
 about contraception/protection usec 3 I believe a condom or dental dam should be used if a teen has oral sex. 0.69 3.35 .59
 about sexual communication with partnerd 3 Before deciding to have sex, I believe teens should talk to their partner about pregnancy. 0.82 3.20 .70
 about sexual communication with parente 1 Before deciding to have sex, I believe teens should talk with their parent(s) or another trusted adult. --
 about sexual communication with doctore 1 Before deciding to have sex, I believe teens should talk with a doctor or another medical professional. --
Self-Efficacy
 for refusing sexf 4 I can say no to someone who is pressuring me to have sex. 0.86 3.36 .60
 for contraception/protection usef 4 I could use a condom correctly or explain to my partner how to use a condom correctly. 0.86 2.53 .81
 about sexual communication with partnerd 4 I could talk to any potential partner to make him/her understand why we should use condoms or contraception. 0.90 3.17 .61
 about sexual communication with parentg 1 I could talk to my parent(s) or another trusted adult if I had a question or was concerned about sex. --
 about sexual communication with doctorg 1 I could talk to a doctor or another medical professional if I had a question or was concerned about sex. --
Norms
 about teen sexual activityc* 3 Most of my friends believe it is OK for teens to be sexually active. 0.78 2.68 .45
 about contraception/protection usec 3 Most of my friends believe condoms should always be used if a teen has sex. 0.85 3.23 .63
 about sexual communication with partnerf 3 Before deciding to have sex, most of my friends believe teens should talk with their partner about pregnancy. 0.89 3.20 .70
 about sexual communication with parente 1 Before deciding to have sex, most of my friends believe teens should talk with their parent(s) or another trusted adult. --
 about sexual communication with doctore 1 Before deciding to have sex, most of my friends believe teens should talk with a doctor or another medical professional. --
 about dating violence acceptanceh* 3 It is OK for a person to hit their girlfriend/boyfriend if she/he did something to make them mad. 0.63 1.44 .49
 about gender role acceptanceh* 5 Raising children is primarily a woman’s responsibility. 0.62 1.87 .56
 Media-Related
Media Skepticismb 3 The media are dishonest about what might happen if people have sex. 0.66 2.94 .72
Perceived Realismb* 3 Teens in the media are as sexually experienced as average teens. 0.80 2.10 .70
Perceived Similarityi* 4 I am like the people in the media. 0.77 2.12 .60

Note: 4pt. Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree)

*

indicates that lower value is a more favorable outcome. For all other variables a higher value indicates a more favorable outcome.

d

adapted from Soet, Dudley, and DiIorio (1999) self-efficacy scale

e

adapted from Halpern-Felsher et al. (2004) self-efficacy scale

g

adapted from Halpern-Felsher et al. (2004)

h

adapted from Foshee et al. (2005)

j

adapted from Pinkleton et al. (2008)