. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;33(4):465–475. doi: 10.1037/fam0000519

Table 3.

Results from path analyses examining effects of family and household characteristics on observed responsive feeding

	Unstandardized B	Standardized β	SE	t-value

Maternal NT distractions	−3.929	−.173	.082	−2.122*
Paternal total distractions	−.959	−.317	.113	−2.817*
Child total distractions	−.457	−.136	.094	−1.452
Government Assistance	−.244	−.136	.096	−1.414
Mealtime routines/rituals (FRQ, 24M)	.167	.183	.094	1.946
Household income	.034	.192	.096	1.991*

Note. NT = Non-technology object related distractions; FRQ = Family Ritual Questionnaire.

Model fit for this path analysis was adequate (X² [df] = 1.21 [1], p = 0.27, SRMR = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.04, p of close fit = 0.33, AIC = 404.07, CFI = 0.998).