Skip to main content
. 2019 May 17;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00278

Table 2.

Comparison of gastrointestinal motility-stimulating actions of ghrelin in several vertebrates.

Species In vitro study In vivo study Action site Reference
Unstimulated Stimulated
Fish
Rainbow trout No effect (112)
Gold fish No effect No effect (EFS) (112)
Zebrafish No effect (35)
Amphibians
Bullfrog No effect (36)
Japanese fire belly newt No effect (36)
Reptiles Research not available
Birds
Chicken Contraction Smooth muscle (crop and proventriculus) (77)
Potentiation of EFS Enteric neurons (proventriculus) (77)
Quail No effect (113)
(41)
Mammals
Human No effect (99)
Contraction (Premature phase-III) (114)
Increase in gastric emptying (115)
Increase in gastrointestinal transit (116)
Dog No effect (motility and gastric emptying) (117)
Inhibition of phase-III Decrease in motilin release (49)
Rat No effect Potentiation of EFS Enteric neurons (99, 118)
Contraction Enteric neurons and vago-vagal reflex (118, 119)
Increase in phase-III (26)
Contraction (colon) Defecation center (120, 121)
Mouse No effect Potentiation of EFS Enteric neurons (24, 122)
Increase in gastric emptying Enteric neurons (122)
Increase in phase-III (27)
Guinea-pig No effect (123125)
No effect (ganglion stimulant) (124)
Contraction (stomach) Vago-vagal reflex (123)
Rabbit No effect (126)
Asian house musk shrew Contraction Enteric neurons (presence of motilin required) (19, 68)
Contraction (phase-II), potentiation of phase-III Enteric neurons and vago-vagal reflex (20)

EFS, Electrical field stimulation for excitation of enteric neurons.