Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):577–591. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000630

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Threshold evaluations. (A) ECochG threshold vs. magnitude. The threshold was taken at the frequency indicated by the symbol, and the response magnitude was the sum of the significant harmonics to 90 dB nHL (corrected to HL for plotting). To look for saturation we plotted the r2 to both a linear and sigmoidal fit; since these were similar the saturation is minimal. (B). ECochG threshold vs. audiometric thresholds. These were significantly correlated, and there were many ECochG thresholds that were lower than the audiometric thresholds (above the dashed line of equality).