Table 2.

Bivariate analysis of variables associated with UI and POP knowledge

	Lack of knowledge on PIKQ-UI scale (< 80% correct)			Lack of knowledge on PIKQ-POP scale (< 50% correct)
	OR	95% CI	p-value	OR	95% CI	p-value
Age, years
18–29	1.84	0.63–5.34	0.26	1.24	0.46–3.32	0.67
30–39	2.21	0.83–5.92	0.11	2.38	0.94–6.03	0.07
40–49	2.33	1.04–5.26	0.04	2.19	1.03–4.68	0.04
50–59	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
60–69	1.88	0.91–3.91	0.91	0.94	0.47–1.86	0.85
70–79	1.92	0.93–3.99	0.93	0.75	0.38–1.50	0.42
≥ 80	3.68	1.49–9.08	0.005	2.66	1.21–5.87	0.01
Education
≥ College	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
Some college	1.41	0.82–2.45	0.22	1.81	1.06–3.10	0.03
≤ High school	6.73	3.31–13.70	< 0.001	5.50	3.16–9.57	< 0.001
Income
> $50,000	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
$30,000 - 50,000	1.30	0.70–2.39	0.41	1.19	0.66–2.13	0.56
< $30,000	3.08	1.65–5.75	< 0.001	2.41	1.40–4.13	0.001
Race
White	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
African-American	2.87	1.49–5.53	0.002	2.29	1.37–3.86	0.002
Other	0.48	0.20–1.12	0.09	0.65	0.27–1.56	0.34
Caffeine
Yes	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
No	1.42	0.88–2.30	0.15	1.79	1.16–2.76	0.009
Information
Yes: Internet	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
No: Internet	2.38	1.46–3.87	< 0.001	2.30	1.49–3.57	< 0.001
Awareness of PFDs
Yes	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
No: UI	6.70	2.96–15.17	< 0.001	6.76	3.65–12.50	< 0.001
No: POP	4.13	2.46–6.92	< 0.001	13.05	7.68–22.17	< 0.001
No: Fecal incontinence	5.93	3.18–11.05	< 0.001	5.62	3.41–9.25	< 0.001
Diagnosis of PFDs
Yes	1.00	ref		1.00	ref
No: UI	1.96	1.09–3.55	0.03	1.54	0.86–2.73	0.14
No: POP	1.71	0.92–3.21	0.25	2.10	1.13–3.89	0.02
No: FI	1.51	0.75–3.05	0.09	1.40	0.72–2.74	0.32
No: UI, FI, and POP	1.43	0.88–2.32	0.15	1.66	1.06–2.59	0.03

As age as a continuous variable did not have a linear relationship with the log odds of our outcomes, it was categorized according to decades of age

Abbreviations: PIKQ prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire, PFDs pelvic floor disorders, UI urinary incontinence, POP prolapse, FI fecal incontinence, ref. referent

Bolded p-values are significant