Skip to main content
. 2019 May 17;10:1049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01049

Table 5.

Model fit indices for the two second-order models to test measurement invariance across the three samples.

Model χ2 df p SRMR RMSEA 90% CI RMSEA CFI ΔCFI
Model 1: Configural model 6970.898 1632 < 0.001 0.061 0.033 0.033–0.034 0.931 0.002
Model 2: Metric invariance model 7175.965 1694 < 0.001 0.060 0.033 0.032–0.034 0.929 0.011
Model 3: Scalar invariance model 8142.429 1744 < 0.001 0.060 0.035 0.035–0.036 0.918

German version sample: N = 2,242; French version sample: N = 386; English version sample: N = 306. Configural model: first- and second-order factor loadings were allowed to vary across groups. Metric invariance model: first- and second-order factor loadings were constrained to be equal across groups. Scalar invariance model: first- and second-order factor loadings and intercepts of the indicators were constrained to be equal across groups.