Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;90(3):275–280. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1597325

Table 2.

Comparison of patients treated with acute THA + ORIF and those treated by ORIF alone followed by secondary THA due to posttraumatic OA. Values are median (range) unless otherwise specified

  Acute THA + ORIF ORIF with secondary THA Mean difference p-value
Number 34 9    
Age 70 (56–87) 65 (58–74) 3 0.1
Follow-up, months 15 (1–82) 72 (15–113) 3 0.0
BMI 23 (15–42) 28 (21–33) 1 0.4
Women, n 10 3   1
Estimated blood loss, L 1.1 (0.4–2.7) 1.1 (0.700–2.0) 60 0.8
Operating time, min 169 (97–310) 143 (100–269) 26 0.2
Oxford Hip Score at 12 months 41 (33–46) 42 (6–48) 2 0.3
Trauma, n       0.4
 Falling from the same level 25 6    
 Fall from high 2    
 Motor vehicle accident 5 1    
 Biking, n 2 2    
Complications, n       0.2
 Infection 2    
 Dislocation 1    
 Periprosthetic fracture 1    

For abbreviations, see Table 1.