Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;10(1):1606628. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1606628

Table 1.

Results of confirmatory factor analyses.

  χ2 (df) p χ2/df RMSEA SRMR CFI
One-factor solution 173.51 (65) < .001 2.67 .126 [.103, .149] .113 .591
Original three-factor solutiona 89.88 (62) .012 1.45 .066 [.032, .095] .081 .892
Modified three-factor solutionb 122.03 (62) < .001 1.97 .098 [.072, .124] .112 .763

RMSEA = robust root mean square error of approximation with a 90% confidence interval, SRMR = standardized root mean square residual, CFI = robust comparative fit index. aSee Figure 1 for details; bBachem and Maercker (2016) proposed a modified three-factor solution, in which the second and third item were counted to the balance scale instead of the reflection scale.