Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jun;33(6):301–307. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001445

Table 2.

Inter-Rater Reliability of the mRUST Score, Overall and Stratified by Final Instrumentation, Defect Size, and Bone Grafting Status

Not Used in KA and ICC
Used in KA and ICC
0/3 scores* 1/3 scores* 2/3 scores* 3/3 scores* KA (95% CI) ICC (95% CI)
Overall 10 (5%) 21 (10%) 24 (11%) 158 (74%) 0.64 (0.54, 0.71) 0.71 (0.65, 0.77)
By Instrumentation
 IMN 1 (1%) 4 (3%) 6 (5%) 104 (90%) 0.65 (0.53, 0.74) 0.75 (0.68, 0.81)
 Plate 6 (25%) 8 (33%) 7 (29%) 3 (13%) 0.88 (0.60, 0.94) 0.90 (0.72, 0.97)
 Ring 3 (10%) 8 (28%) 7 (24%) 11 (38%) 0.47 (0.13, 0.69) 0.62 (0.36, 0.83)
 None 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 4 (9%) 40 (89%) 0.48 (0.28, 0.63) 0.57 (0.41, 0.72)

Defect Size (cm)
  <2.5 5 (5%) 8 (7%) 9 (8%) 87 (80%) 0.60 (0.46, 0.71) 0.70 (0.61, 0.78)
  2.5–5.0 3 (6%) 8 (15%) 6 (12%) 35 (67%) 0.77 (0.60, 0.85) 0.85 (0.77, 0.91)
  >5.0 2 (4%) 5 (10%) 9 (17%) 36 (69%) 0.57 (0.36, 0.71) 0.67 (0.53, 0.79)
Grafted prior to X-ray?
  No 3 (3%) 10 (10%) 10 (10%) 81 (78%) 0.61 (0.47, 0.72) 0.70 (0.61, 0.78)
  Yes 7 (6%) 11 (10%) 14 (13%) 77 (71%) 0.66 (0.54, 0.75) 0.73 (0.64, 0.80)
  Yes, days prior:
   <30 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
   30–90 0 (0%) 3 (21%) 1 (7%) 10 (71%) 0.60 (0.19, 0.79) 0.67 (0.31, 0.90)
   >90 7 (8%) 8 (9%) 12 (13%) 65 (71%) 0.66 (0.52, 0.76) 0.74 (0.65, 0.82)
*

- the number of raters (0, 1, 2, or 3) out of 3 who provided an mRUST score for all 4 cortices of a given case.

KA indicates Krippendorff’s Alpha; ICC indicates Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.