Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;18:76. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0962-x

Table 1.

Mean, mean difference, and percent difference of neighborhood-level characteristics of the first quintile (Q1, lowest access) and fifth quintile (Q5, highest access) of spatial accessibility to pediatric primary care in 2015 Philadelphia, PA

Neighborhood variable Spatial access Q1 Spatial access Q5 Q5-Q1 % Differencea
% non-Hispanic Black 0.55 0.24 −0.31 129.2*
% Hispanic 0.07 0.06 −0.01 16.7
% non-Hispanic Asian 0.03 0.06 0.30 50.0
SES Factor Scoreb −4.96 0.825 5.80 701.2*
% < 5 years of age 0.08 0.06 −0.02 33.3
% < 18 years of age 0.26 0.18 − 0.08 44.4
% persons with high school education or more 0.80 0.86 0.06 7.0
median household income 34,564.5 42,750.0 8185 19.1
% households with public assistance 0.10 0.06 −0.03 66.7
Gini Index of income inequalityc 0.44 0.49 0.05 10.2
% persons below poverty level (all ages) 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.0
% persons less than 18 below poverty level 0.40 0.21 −0.19 90.5*
% under 18 with private health insurance only 0.30 0.49 0.19 38.8
% under 18 with public health insurance only 0.61 0.39 −0.22 56.4*
% under 18 with no health insurance coverage 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.0
% unemployed 0.17 0.11 −0.06 54.5*
% single parent household with children under 18 0.21 0.10 −0.11 110.0*
% of occupied housing units with > 1 person per room 0.02 0.02 −0.00 0.0
Density of violent crime per 10,000 people 259.9 184.7 −75.2 40.7
Density of drug offenses per 10,000 people 26.3 12.7 −13.6 107.1*
% housing units with no vehicle available 0.33 0.36 0.03 8.3

*significant difference of means at p = 0.05 using unpaired t-test

a% difference = |Q5 – Q1|/ Q5

bnon-weighted score based on 6 measures: (1) median value of occupied housing units, (2) % persons 25 years of age and older with a high school education or more, (3) % persons 25 years of age and older with a Bachelor’s degree or more, (4) % residents with management, professional, or related occupation, (5) median household income, (6) % house with interest, dividends, or net rental income

csummarizes the allocation of money in an area. 0 corresponds to perfectly equal income distribution among residents. 1 corresponds to perfect inequality, a single resident receiving all the income for the area [26]