Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):496–510. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0887-4

Table 3.

Estimated Covariances Between Propensities to False Alarm on Critical Lures from each Recognition Paradigm with Continuous Measures of GPA and SAT in Experiment 1

GPA SAT/ACT
SDI −.01 (−.12, 0.11) −28.97 (−60.93, 2.99)
BF −.06 (−.19, 0.06) −23.58 (−57.26, 10.10)
DRM −.03 (−.12, 0.07) 10.60 (−14.33, 35.54)

Note: Parenthetical values reflect 95% Wald confidence intervals