Table 4.
Estimated Relations of True Hit Rates with both Propensities to False Alarm (FA) to Critical Lures from other Paradigms as well as with Continuous Measures of GPA and SAT in Experiment 1
| Paradigm | Association with |
Estimate | DF | t Value | Unadjusted p-value |
Bonferroni Adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF (Hits) | DRM (FA) | 1.30 | 132.1 | 1.75 | .08 | .33 |
| SDI (FA) | 3.07 | 165.7 | 2.98 | .003 | .01 | |
| SAT | 51.05 | 2858 | .79 | .43 | 1 | |
| GPA | .52 | 145.1 | 2.28 | .02 | .10 | |
| DRM (Hits) | BF (FA) | 1.70 | 113.3 | 2.21 | .03 | .12 |
| SDI (FA) | .46 | 140.2 | .59 | .56 | 1 | |
| SAT | −10.56 | 2858 | −.21 | .84 | 1 | |
| GPA | .01 | 145.2 | .07 | .94 | 1 | |
| SDI (Hits) | BF (FA) | 1.52 | 76.61 | 1.65 | .10 | .41 |
| DRM (FA) | 0.96 | 127.9 | 1.22 | .22 | .89 | |
| SAT | 76.36 | 2858 | 1.11 | .27 | 1 | |
| GPA | .05 | 114.7 | .06 | .96 | 1 |