Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;2019(5):CD012832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012832.pub2

Comparison 1. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) versus sham (short term).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Urological symptom scores 1 206 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐5.20 [‐7.44, ‐2.96]
2 Quality of life 1 206 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.20 [‐1.67, ‐0.73]
3 Major adverse events 1 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.3 [0.41, 26.28]
4 Ejaculatory function 1 144 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.50 [‐0.38, 1.38]
5 Erectile function 1 197 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.4 [‐3.24, 0.44]
6 Minor adverse events 1 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.69 [1.33, 2.16]
7 Acute urinary retention 1 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.03, 7.42]
8 Hospital stay (days) 1 201 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.03 [‐0.09, 0.15]