Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;2019(5):CD012832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012832.pub2

Roehrborn 2013.

Methods Study design: multicentre randomized blinded trial
Setting/country: 19 centres in US 14, Canada 2, Australia 3
Dates when study was conducted: February to December 2011
Participants Inclusion criteria: men aged ≥ 50 years, provided informed consent, had no prior surgical treatment for BPH, and were required to undergo washouts of 2 weeks for alpha‐blocker, 3 months for 5a‐reductase inhibitor, and 3 days for anticoagulants. Admission to the study required ≥ IPSS 13, Qmax ≤ 12 mL/second with a 125 mL voided volume and a 30‐ to 80‐mL prostate volume
Exclusion criteria: median lobe obstruction, retention, postvoid residual volume > 250 mL, active infection, PSA > 10 ng/mL (unless negative biopsy), cystolithiasis within 3 months, and bacterial prostatitis within 1 year
Total number of participants randomly assigned: 206
Group A (PUL)
  • Number of all participants randomly assigned: 140

  • Age (mean ± SD): 67 ± 8.6 years

  • Prostate volume (mean ± SD): 44.5 ± 12.4 mL

  • PSA (mean ± SD): 2.4 ± 2.0 ng/mL

  • IPSS (mean ± SD): 22.2 ± 5.48

  • Qmax (mean ± SD): 8.9 ± 2.2 mL/second


Group B (Sham)
  • Number of all participants randomly assigned: 66

  • Age (mean ± SD): 65 ± 8.0 years

  • Prostate volume (mean ± SD): 40.9 ± 10.8 mL

  • PSA (mean ± SD): 2.1 ± 1.6 ng/mL

  • IPSS: 24.4 ± 5.75

  • Qmax (mean ± SD): 8.8 ± 2.2 mL/second

Interventions Group A: PUL
Transprostatic adjustable UroLift implants are permanently implanted to retract obstructing lateral lobes and expand the urethral lumen. After rigid cystoscopy is performed, the implant delivery device is inserted into the 20‐F sheath. Under cystoscopic visualization using a 2.9 mm 0‐degree lens, the delivery device is angled anterolaterally to compress the obstructive lobe. A 19‐gauge needle, housing a monofilament with metallic tab, is then deployed through the prostate lobe. As the needle is retracted, the tab engages the prostate capsule and the monofilament is tensioned. Finally, the urethral end‐piece is attached to the monofilament, which is then cut, delivering the in situ‐sized implant.
Group B: sham
Conducted with as similar an experience as possible to PUL.
Follow‐up: 3 months
Outcomes Primary outcome
  • Reduction in IPSS at 3 months after the PUL procedure was ≥ 25% greater than that of sham


How measured: IPSS questionnaires
Time points measured: at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months
Time points reported: at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months
Secondary outcome
  • QoL (IPSS‐QoL)

  • BPH Impact Index

  • International Index of Erectile Function

  • MSHQ‐EjD


How measured: questionnaires
Time points measured: at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months
Time points reported: at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months
Safety outcomes
How measured: adverse events
Time points measured: not reported
Time points reported: at 3 months
Subgroup: none
Funding sources NeoTract, Fe/Male Health Centre
Declarations of interest NeoTract, Fe/Male Health Centre
Notes Protocol: NCT01294150
Language of publication: English
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was conducted just before treatment using permuted blocks of various sizes chosen at random through a central electronic data program."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "concealed through password protected electronic database program."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Subjective outcomes High risk Judgement: we contacted with author and they clarified the blinding of participants and outcome assessor. The personnel were not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Low risk Quote: "An independent data monitoring committee assessed safety, and all AEs were adjudicated and assessed by an independent clinical events committee… A double‐blind was maintained through the 3‐month end point with the patient and questionnaire administrator blinded to randomization. Blinding of participants was tested upon discharge and at each follow‐up to 3 months."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Judgement: objective outcomes were not likely affected by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Urological symptom scores/QoL Low risk Judgement: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Major adverse events/minor adverse events Low risk Judgement: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Retreatment Low risk Judgement: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Erectile function Low risk Judgement: 132/140 (94.2%) of randomized participants in PUL and 65/66 (98.4%) in sham groups were included in the analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Ejaculatory function High risk Judgement: 94/140 (67.1%) of randomized participants in PUL and 50/66 (75.7%) in sham groups were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Acute urinary retention Low risk Judgement: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Indwelling catheter Unclear risk Judgement: not described in the study or protocol.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Hospital stay Low risk Judgement: 137/140 (97.8%) of randomized participants in PUL and 64/66 (96.9%) in sham groups were included in analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Judgement: review outcomes were prespecified in the protocol (NCT01294150) and were analyzed as planned.
Other bias Low risk Judgement: not detected.

BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; IPSS: International Prostate Symptom Score; MSHQ‐EjD: Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction; PGI‐I: Patient Global Impression of Improvement; PSA: prostate‐specific antigen; PUL: prostatic urethral lift; Qmax: maximum flow rate; QoL: quality of life; SD: standard deviation; SF‐6D: Short‐Form Six‐Dimension; SF‐12: 12‐item Short‐Form Health Survey; TURP: transurethral resection of prostate.