Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;57(6):e01113-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01113-18

TABLE 2.

Summary measures of accuracy of commercial and in-house tests for all studiesa

Reference standard Test property % sensitivity (95% CI, I2) % specificity (95% CI, I2) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
All studies (63 studies) Culture (71 data sets with 1,492 TBM cases) 82 (75–87, 82.4) 99 (98–99, 85.0) 58.6 (35.3–97.3) 0.19 (0.14–0.25) 314 (169–584) 98 (96–99)
CRS (24 data sets with 652 TBM cases) 68 (41–87, 83.6) 98 (95–99, 76.2) 36.5 (15.6–85.3) 0.32 (0.15–0.70) 113 (39–331) 98 (96–99)
Culture (71 data sets) In-house tests (43 data sets with 950 TBM cases) 87 (80–92, 82.0) 99 (97–99, 88.5) 64.6 (28.4–147.0) 0.13 (0.08–0.20) 372 (165–839) 98 (97–99)
Commercial tests (28 data sets with 543 TBM cases) 67 (58–75, 64.8) 99 (98–99, 48.3) 46.1 (28.3–75.0) 0.33 (0.25–0.43) 139 (71–274) 98 (96–99)
CRS (24 data sets) In-house tests (21 data sets with 626 TBM cases) 68 (38–88, 83.5) 98 (95–100, 78.0) 44.4 (16.0–123.2) 0.32 (0.14–0.75) 138 (41–468) 98 (96–99)
Commercial tests (3 data sets with 26 TBM cases) 53 (33–73, 84.7) 90 (82–95, 52.2) 70.0 (40.0–124.2) 0.57 (0.24–0.31) 21 (4.2–104) 94 (90–97)
a

CRS, combined reference standard; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; AUC; area under the curve; I2, I-square statistic.