Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;57(6):e01113-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01113-18

TABLE 3.

Subgroup analysis of studies based on different NAA testsa

Reference standard Subgroup Subgroup by method No. of data sets % sensitivity (95% CI) % specificity (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Culture In-house Conventional PCR (IS6110 gene) 18 87 (77–93) 98 (94–99) 39.5 (15.7–77.1) 0.13 (0.07–0.25) 307 (106–888) 98 (96–99)
Conventional PCR (MPB64 gene) 4 92 (81–97) 98 (78–99) 52.0 (3.4–778.4) 0.08 (0.03–0.20) 275 (42–1,814) 93 (91–95)
Nested PCR 4 82 (46–96) 92 (88–95) 10.7 (5.9–19.4) 0.19 (0.05–0.79) 55 (9–339) 93 (91–95)
Real-time PCR 7 84 (71–92) 100 (45–100) 44.0 (5.7–335.4) 0.16 (0.08,0.65) 255 (40–607) 93 (91–95)
LAMP PCR 2 93 (88 –97) 100 (98 –100) 68.8 (0.68–925.8) 0.07 (0.03–0.13)
Commercial Cobas Amplicor MTB 4 48 (35–61) 98 (97–99) 25.3 (12.9–49.7) 0.53 (0.41–0.68) 48 (21–109) 94 (91–95)
GeneXpert 16 61 (52–70) 99 (97–99) 42.0 (20.6–85.2) 0.39 (0.31–0.50) 107 (64–251) 92 (89–94)
Gen-Probe MTD 4 86 (52–97) 99 (95–100) 92.4 (14.8–577.6) 0.15 (0.03–0.63) 634 (31–1,299) 99 (98–100)
CRS In-house Conventional PCR (IS6110 gene) 9 87 (46–98) 98 (88–100) 39.2 (7.8–197.8) 0.13 (0.02–0.78) 119 (42–332) 99 (97–99)
Conventional PCR (MPB64 gene) 4 27 (02–85) 99 (91–100) 35.9 (1.7–751.1) 0.74 (0.36–1.52) 45 (8–249) 99 (97–99)
Nested PCR 3 80 (70 –88) 95 (0.89–98) 11.9 (5.3–6.7) 0.23 (0.05–1.02) 86 (7–1,049) 97 (93–99)
Commercial GeneXpert 2 66 (38–88) 89 (80–95) 7.0 (3.8–12.8) 0.23 (0.00–19.53)
a

CRS, combined reference standard; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; AUC, area under the curve; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.