Skip to main content
. 2019 Spring;12(2):116–123.

Table 4.

Results of logistic binary regression analysis of combined LFT and US results (independent variable) and CBD stone (dependent variable)

All patients
Age <55
Age ≥55
No OR P-value No OR P-value No OR P-value
Normal liver enzymes
+ Normal CBD
138 0.28 (0.146, 0.55) <0.001 64 NS NS 74 0.46 (0.23, 0.91) 0.016
Normal liver enzymes
+ Dilated CBD
106 0.14(0.05, 0.39) <0.001 50 0.25 (0.06, 1.04) 0.02 56 0.10 (0.03, 0.43) <0.001
Isolated rise of liver enzymes
+ Normal CBD
190 0.23(0.12, 0.42) <0.001 86 0.43 (0.18, 1.04) 0.04 104 0.1587(0.068, 0.37) <0.001
Isolated rise of liver enzymes
+ Dilated CBD
90 1.17 (0.69, 1.98) 0.545 40 1.75 (0.76, 4.03) 0.208 50 0.9938 (0.51, 1.96) 0.986
Hyperbilirubinemia
+ Normal CBD
346 1.52 (1.11, 2.08) 0.01 120 1.23 (0.67, 2.28) 0.502 226 1.54 (1.06, 2.24) 0.025
Hyperbilirubinemia
+ Dilated CBD
152 5.12 (3.54, 7.41) <0.001 48 6.85 (3.49, 13.43) <0.001 104 4.31(2.77, 6.72) <0.001

LFT: liver function tests; CBD: common bile duct; US: ultrasound; MRCP: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; OR: odds ratio; Values in parentheses: 95% confidence intervals; NS: Not estimable