Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Mar 17;194:272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.021

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Processing times and Dice coefficients as a function of crop size fraction for THOMAS obtained from a small subset of 5 datasets. While the crop size fractions of 0.01 and 0.04 are both ideal from a processing time standpoint, 0.04 corresponds to a bilateral thalamus crop and was chosen. See Figure 2 for the visualization. Note the relative insensitivity of Dice to crop fraction while the processing time increases exponentially with size.