Skip to main content
. 2019 May 27;9:7886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44418-6

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fracture force evaluation of TI-DMNs compared with conventional DMNs. (A) Fracture occurred upon applying 0.38 ± 0.10 N in conventional DMNs and (B) 0.39 ± 0.06 N in TI-DMNs. (C) There was no significant difference in fracture force of conventional DMNs compared with TI-DMNs. (D) Microscope images showed a breakage in the middle of conventional DMNs. (E) In TI-DMNs, the breakage occurred at the neck region. Arrows indicate the breakage site. Scale bars in (D) and (E) are 500 µm.