TABLE 3.
Food security status for the 10 universities participating in the study
| University (n) | High food security, n (%) | Marginal food security, n (%) | Low food security, n (%) | Very low food security, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (345) | 145 (42.0) | 67 (19.4) | 62 (18.0) | 71 (20.6) |
| 2 (4463) | 2132 (47.8) | 1006 (22.5) | 626 (12.0) | 699 (15.7) |
| 3 (56) | 16 (28.6) | 11 (19.6) | 16 (28.6) | 13 (23.2) |
| 4 (692) | 236 (34.1) | 209 (29.3) | 115 (16.6) | 138 (19.9) |
| 5 (1093) | 337 (30.8) | 251 (30.0) | 240 (22.0) | 265 (24.2) |
| 6 (5262) | 2939 (55.9) | 1147 (21.8) | 663 (12.6) | 513 (9.7) |
| 7 (569) | 202 (35.5) | 158 (27.8) | 107 (18.8) | 102 (17.9) |
| 8 (241) | 72 (29.9) | 55 (22.8) | 76 (15.8) | 76 (31.5) |
| 9 (414) | 153 (37.0) | 116 (28.0) | 66 (15.9) | 79 (19.1) |
| 10 (507) | 176 (34.7) | 95 (18.7) | 111 (21.9) | 125 (24.7) |