Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;20(6):916–930. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0032

Table 5. Diagnostic Performance of FF, R2*, and Combination of FF and R2* for Predicting Osteopenia in Each Group.

Parameters Males (Age ≥ 50 Years) Females (Postmenopausal)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) AUC P Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) AUC P
FF
 Reader 1 100.0 52.3 0.779 (0.651–0.877) 0.001 96.8 25.0 0.604 (0.477–0.721) 0.135
 Reader 2 100.0 46.2 0.768 (0.638–0.868) 0.005 96.8 27.8 0.620 (0.493–0.736) 0.083
R2*
 Reader 1 100.0 26.9 0.518 (0.383–0.651) 0.897 74.2 61.1 0.699 (0.575–0.805) 0.003
 Reader 2 100.0 32.8 0.526 (0.390–0.658) 0.856 74.2 72.2 0.735 (0.613–0.835) < 0.001
FF + R2*
 Reader 1 100.0 59.6 0.782 (0.654–0.880) < 0.001 67.7 72.2 0.702 (0.577–0.807) 0.002
 Reader 2 100.0 46.2 0.766 (0.636–0.867) 0.005 77.4 66.7 0.736 (0.614–0.836) < 0.001

Younger males and premenopausal females included only one osteopenic subject, resulting in insufficient data for ROC curve analysis. Numbers in parentheses are lower and upper bounds of 95% CIs. p value of AUC. ROC = receiver operating characteristic