Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;8(5):2146–2156. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2110

Table 4.

TNM classification (AJCC 2009, only with four clinical classifications)

  Current study AJCC data P‐value
Number % of Total % Among patients with T1a‐T4b
T status
Tis 753 23.6%      
T1a 518 16.2% 21.6% 34.2% P < 0.000001 chi‐square test
T1b 75 2.4% 3.1% 8.6%
T2a 321 10.1% 13.4% 5.5%
T2b 105 3.3% 4.4% 23.6%
T3a 277 8.7% 11.6% 11.3%
T3b 298 9.3% 12.4% 7.8%
T4a 225 7.1% 9.4% 3.8%
T4b 576 18.1% 24.1% 5.1%
Not available 40 1.3%      
  Number % of Total % Among patients with N1a‐N3
N status
0 2249 70.5%      
N1a 259 8.1% 29.1% 44.3% P < 0.000001 chi‐square test
N1b 81 2.5% 9.1% 4.7%
N2a 154 4.8% 17.3% 17.4%
N2b 82 2.6% 9.2% 4.6%
N2c 38 1.2% 4.3% 12.1%
N3 275 8.6% 30.9% 16.9%
Not available 50 1.6%      
  Number % of Total      
M status
0 2990 93.8% 6.2%    
M1 46 1.4%    
M1a 43 1.3%    
M1b 79 2.5%    
M1c 30 0.9%